Distributed Systems · Research Paper

Fault-Domain-Aware Federated Quorum Certification

Adversary policies, domain-cover margins, and exact portfolio certification

Research reportMF-PRISM-DLT-2026-04 / v0.2

Certify quorum safety under correlated failures rather than validator counts alone. Organization, region and infrastructure incidents are modeled explicitly through domain-cover policies and exact witness searches.

Cover of Fault-Domain-Aware Federated Quorum Certification
Current public editionv0.2 · 2026-09-12
Identifier
MF-PRISM-DLT-2026-04
Series
Distributed Systems
Edition
Version 0.2
Length
20 pages
Reserved DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22728320 (record reserved)
01

What is this paper trying to establish?

How should federated quorum safety be certified when failures are correlated by organization, region, or infrastructure?

02

The central idea.

Certify quorum safety under correlated failures rather than validator counts alone. Organization, region and infrastructure incidents are modeled explicitly through domain-cover policies and exact witness searches.

Current status

Fault-domain certification methods and exact analysis of an illustrative topology. The case study is not production Metriq infrastructure evidence.

This report develops a conditional method and evaluates it within the stated evidence. It does not establish production performance, operational safety, or calibrated real-world predictive skill beyond that evidence.

03

What changes if the method holds?

Counting validators can badly overstate resilience when many share one failure domain. Explicit domain-cover policies expose those correlated risks.

04

Where scrutiny should concentrate.

The paper identifies the following points as the highest-value targets for independent review.

  1. 01
    Completeness and truth of the declared failure-domain catalog.
  2. 02
    Domain-cover characterization and structured-fault assumptions.
  3. 03
    Distinguish illustrative topology margins from production resilience.
Publication record

An open, inspectable research artifact.

The public record links the manuscript to its release, source package, review materials, and persistent identifier. Status travels with the paper; a reserved DOI is not presented as a published Zenodo record.

Document
Research Paper
Review status
Open for independent review
Published
2026-09-12
DOI status
Reserved · 10.5281/zenodo.22728320
Canonical record
MF-PRISM-DLT-2026-04
Metriq PRISM Laboratory, Fault-Domain-Aware Federated Quorum Certification, Metriq PRISM Laboratory Research Paper MF-PRISM-DLT-2026-04, Version 0.2, 2026. Corresponding contributor: Daniel H. Jeffery, ORCID 0009-0001-1200-6042. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22728320.