Fault-Domain-Aware Federated Quorum Certification
Adversary policies, domain-cover margins, and exact portfolio certification
Certify quorum safety under correlated failures rather than validator counts alone. Organization, region and infrastructure incidents are modeled explicitly through domain-cover policies and exact witness searches.

- Identifier
- MF-PRISM-DLT-2026-04
- Series
- Distributed Systems
- Edition
- Version 0.2
- Length
- 20 pages
- Reserved DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.22728320 (record reserved)
What is this paper trying to establish?
How should federated quorum safety be certified when failures are correlated by organization, region, or infrastructure?
The central idea.
Certify quorum safety under correlated failures rather than validator counts alone. Organization, region and infrastructure incidents are modeled explicitly through domain-cover policies and exact witness searches.
Fault-domain certification methods and exact analysis of an illustrative topology. The case study is not production Metriq infrastructure evidence.
This report develops a conditional method and evaluates it within the stated evidence. It does not establish production performance, operational safety, or calibrated real-world predictive skill beyond that evidence.
What changes if the method holds?
Counting validators can badly overstate resilience when many share one failure domain. Explicit domain-cover policies expose those correlated risks.
Where scrutiny should concentrate.
The paper identifies the following points as the highest-value targets for independent review.
- 01Completeness and truth of the declared failure-domain catalog.
- 02Domain-cover characterization and structured-fault assumptions.
- 03Distinguish illustrative topology margins from production resilience.
An open, inspectable research artifact.
The public record links the manuscript to its release, source package, review materials, and persistent identifier. Status travels with the paper; a reserved DOI is not presented as a published Zenodo record.
- Document
- Research Paper
- Review status
- Open for independent review
- Published
- 2026-09-12
- DOI status
- Reserved · 10.5281/zenodo.22728320
- Canonical record
- MF-PRISM-DLT-2026-04